What is the difference between a library and a framework using React as an example?

👨‍💻 Frontend Developer 🟠 May come up 🎚️ Medium
#React

Brief Answer

Library is a collection of functions and components that developers can use as needed, maintaining control over the application architecture. Framework is a more comprehensive solution that dictates the application structure and provides a ready-made architecture.

React is a library because:

  • Developers decide how to structure the application
  • Can be used together with other libraries
  • Does not require a strict project structure
  • Provides only tools for working with the user interface

What is a Library

A library is a set of ready-made functions, classes, and components that can be connected to a project and used as needed. A library does not dictate the application architecture and does not limit the developer in choosing approaches.

Key Library Characteristics

  1. Flexibility — can use only the necessary parts
  2. Independence — does not require a strict structure
  3. Integration — easily combines with other tools
  4. Control — developer controls the execution flow
// Example of using the Lodash library
import { debounce, throttle } from 'lodash';
 
// Can use only the necessary functions
const debouncedHandler = debounce(handleInput, 300);
const throttledScroll = throttle(handleScroll, 100);

What is a Framework

A framework is a comprehensive solution that provides a ready-made application architecture, a set of rules and constraints. A framework dictates how the application should be structured and how its components should interact.

Key Framework Characteristics

  1. Structured — requires adherence to a specific architecture
  2. Inversion of control — framework controls the execution flow
  3. Comprehensive — usually includes many tools
  4. Constraints — imposes certain rules on development
// Example of Angular structure (framework)
import { Component } from '@angular/core';
 
@Component({
  selector: 'app-user',
  template: '<h1>{{name}}</h1>'
})
export class UserComponent {
  name = 'Alexander';
  
  // Must follow Angular rules
  ngOnInit() {
    // Initialization logic
  }
}

Why React is a Library

React is officially positioned as a library, not a framework. This is because React provides only tools for working with the user interface and does not dictate how to structure the entire application.

1. Flexibility in Architecture Choice

React does not require using a specific application architecture:

// Can use different approaches to structure
 
// Approach 1: Simple component
function App() {
  return <div>Hello, world!</div>;
}
 
// Approach 2: With state
function App() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  return (
    <div>
      <p>Counter: {count}</p>
      <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>Increment</button>
    </div>
  );
}
 
// Approach 3: Using Redux
function App() {
  const count = useSelector(state => state.count);
  const dispatch = useDispatch();
  
  return (
    <div>
      <p>Counter: {count}</p>
      <button onClick={() => dispatch(increment())}>Increment</button>
    </div>
  );
}

2. Integration with Other Libraries

React easily integrates with other libraries and tools:

// Using React with a chart library
import { Line } from 'react-chartjs-2';
import { useQuery } from 'react-query';
 
function Dashboard() {
  // Using react-query for API work
  const { data, isLoading } = useQuery('users', fetchUsers);
  
  if (isLoading) return <div>Loading...</div>;
  
  // Using react-chartjs-2 for displaying charts
  const chartData = {
    labels: data.map(user => user.name),
    datasets: [{
      label: 'Activity',
      data: data.map(user => user.activity)
    }]
  };
  
  return <Line data={chartData} />;
}

3. No Mandatory Project Structure

React does not require a strict file and folder structure:

// Structure 1: By types
src/
  components/
    Button.jsx
    Card.jsx
  pages/
    Home.jsx
    Profile.jsx
  utils/
    api.js
    helpers.js

// Structure 2: By functionality
src/
  auth/
    components/
      LoginForm.jsx
    pages/
      Login.jsx
    utils/
      auth.js
  dashboard/
    components/
      Chart.jsx
    pages/
      Dashboard.jsx

4. Control of Execution Flow

In React, the developer controls the application execution flow:

// Developer controls when and how state is updated
function TodoApp() {
  const [todos, setTodos] = useState([]);
  const [filter, setFilter] = useState('all');
  
  // Control task addition
  const addTodo = (text) => {
    const newTodo = {
      id: Date.now(),
      text,
      completed: false
    };
    setTodos([...todos, newTodo]);
  };
  
  // Control filtering
  const filteredTodos = todos.filter(todo => {
    if (filter === 'active') return !todo.completed;
    if (filter === 'completed') return todo.completed;
    return true;
  });
  
  return (
    <div>
      <TodoForm onAdd={addTodo} />
      <TodoFilter currentFilter={filter} onChange={setFilter} />
      <TodoList todos={filteredTodos} />
    </div>
  );
}

Comparison with Real Frameworks

React vs Angular

CharacteristicReactAngular
TypeLibraryFramework
StructureFlexibleStrict
LanguageJavaScript/JSXTypeScript
ControlDeveloperFramework
SizeSmallerLarger
LearningEasierHarder
// React - developer controls state management
import { useState } from 'react';
 
function Counter() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  
  // Full control over state updates
  const increment = () => setCount(count + 1);
  const decrement = () => setCount(count - 1);
  const reset = () => setCount(0);
  
  return (
    <div>
      <p>Counter: {count}</p>
      <button onClick={increment}>+</button>
      <button onClick={decrement}>-</button>
      <button onClick={reset}>Reset</button>
    </div>
  );
}
// Angular - framework dictates structure
import { Component } from '@angular/core';
 
@Component({
  selector: 'app-counter',
  template: `
    <div>
      <p>Counter: {{ count }}</p>
      <button (click)="increment()">+</button>
      <button (click)="decrement()">-</button>
      <button (click)="reset()">Reset</button>
    </div>
  `
})
export class CounterComponent {
  count = 0;
  
  // Must follow Angular rules
  increment() {
    this.count++;
  }
  
  decrement() {
    this.count--;
  }
  
  reset() {
    this.count = 0;
  }
}

React vs Vue

CharacteristicReactVue
TypeLibraryFramework
TemplatesJSXHTML templates
ReactivityuseState/useReducerReactive data
EcosystemLargeGrowing
// React - imperative approach to reactivity
function UserCard({ user }) {
  const [isEditing, setIsEditing] = useState(false);
  const [name, setName] = useState(user.name);
  
  const save = () => {
    // Manually update state
    updateUser(user.id, { name });
    setIsEditing(false);
  };
  
  return (
    <div>
      {isEditing ? (
        <input 
          value={name} 
          onChange={(e) => setName(e.target.value)} 
        />
      ) : (
        <h2>{name}</h2>
      )}
      <button onClick={() => setIsEditing(!isEditing)}>
        {isEditing ? 'Save' : 'Edit'}
      </button>
    </div>
  );
}
<!-- Vue - declarative approach to reactivity -->
<template>
  <div>
    <input v-if="isEditing" v-model="name" />
    <h2 v-else>{{ name }}</h2>
    <button @click="toggleEdit">
      {{ isEditing ? 'Save' : 'Edit' }}
    </button>
  </div>
</template>
 
<script>
export default {
  props: ['user'],
  data() {
    return {
      isEditing: false,
      name: this.user.name
    }
  },
  methods: {
    toggleEdit() {
      this.isEditing = !this.isEditing;
      if (!this.isEditing) {
        this.updateUser();
      }
    },
    updateUser() {
      // Vue automatically tracks changes
      this.$emit('update-user', this.user.id, { name: this.name });
    }
  }
}
</script>

Library Advantages over Framework

1. Flexibility

Library allows choosing only the necessary tools:

// Can use only the necessary parts
import { useState } from 'react'; // Only state hook
// No need to connect the entire React
 
function SimpleComponent() {
  const [count, setCount] = useState(0);
  return <button onClick={() => setCount(count + 1)}>{count}</button>;
}

2. Fewer Constraints

Library does not impose strict constraints on development:

// Can use different approaches to styling
import './Button.css'; // CSS modules
import styled from 'styled-components'; // CSS-in-JS
import { css } from '@emotion/react'; // Emotion
 
// All approaches are compatible with React

3. Easier to Learn

Library is easier to learn as it does not require knowledge of the entire architecture:

// Enough to know the basics to get started
function Hello() {
  return <h1>Hello, world!</h1>;
}
 
// ReactDOM.render(<Hello />, document.getElementById('root'));

Library Disadvantages Compared to Framework

1. Need to Make More Decisions

Developers need to independently choose architecture and additional tools:

// Need to choose how to manage state
// Option 1: useState
const [users, setUsers] = useState([]);
 
// Option 2: Redux
const users = useSelector(state => state.users);
 
// Option 3: Context API
const { users } = useContext(UserContext);
 
// Option 4: Zustand
const { users } = useUserStore();

2. More Code for Standard Tasks

For some tasks, more code may be required:

// React - need to implement routing independently
import { useState, useEffect } from 'react';
 
function Router() {
  const [currentPath, setCurrentPath] = useState(window.location.pathname);
  
  useEffect(() => {
    const onLocationChange = () => {
      setCurrentPath(window.location.pathname);
    };
    
    window.addEventListener('popstate', onLocationChange);
    return () => window.removeEventListener('popstate', onLocationChange);
  }, []);
  
  return (
    <div>
      {currentPath === '/' && <HomePage />}
      {currentPath === '/about' && <AboutPage />}
      {currentPath === '/contact' && <ContactPage />}
    </div>
  );
}
 
// With a framework this would be simpler

3. Team Consistency Issues

Without a strict architecture, inconsistency in approaches may arise:

// Developer 1 uses one approach
function UserProfile({ userId }) {
  const [user, setUser] = useState(null);
  
  useEffect(() => {
    fetchUser(userId).then(setUser);
  }, [userId]);
  
  return user ? <div>{user.name}</div> : <div>Loading...</div>;
}
 
// Developer 2 uses another approach
class UserProfile extends React.Component {
  constructor(props) {
    super(props);
    this.state = { user: null };
  }
  
  componentDidMount() {
    fetchUser(this.props.userId).then(user => {
      this.setState({ user });
    });
  }
  
  render() {
    return this.state.user ? 
      <div>{this.state.user.name}</div> : 
      <div>Loading...</div>;
  }
}

When to Choose Library vs Framework

Choose Library (React) if:

  1. Need flexibility — want to control application architecture
  2. Have experience — team familiar with different tools
  3. Complex integrations — need to integrate with different systems
  4. Gradual migration — replacing part of an existing application
// Good for integration into existing applications
// Adding React component to jQuery application
$('#react-container').each(function() {
  const props = JSON.parse($(this).data('props'));
  ReactDOM.render(<LegacyIntegration {...props} />, this);
});

Choose Framework if:

  1. No experience — new team and need ready-made architecture
  2. Standard tasks — typical web application without complex integrations
  3. Fast development — need to quickly create MVP
  4. Large team — need unified architecture for everyone
// Angular - everything included "out of the box"
import { NgModule } from '@angular/core';
import { BrowserModule } from '@angular/platform-browser';
import { HttpClientModule } from '@angular/common/http';
import { ReactiveFormsModule } from '@angular/forms';
 
@NgModule({
  imports: [
    BrowserModule,
    HttpClientModule,
    ReactiveFormsModule
    // Everything necessary is already included
  ],
  // Automatic dependency injection setup
})
export class AppModule { }

Summary

React is a library, not a framework, because:

Flexibility — does not dictate application architecture ✅ Integration — easily combines with other tools ✅ Control — developer controls execution flow ✅ Modularity — can use only necessary parts

Key differences:

  • Library: “You call the library when you need it”
  • Framework: “The framework calls you, and you must respond”

Choice depends on:

  • 🎯 Project requirements — flexibility vs structure
  • 👥 Team experience — independence vs ready solutions
  • Development timelines — control vs speed
  • 🔧 Integrations — compatibility vs comprehensiveness

Understanding these differences helps make more informed decisions when choosing technologies for a project.


Want more articles for interview preparation? Subscribe to EasyAdvice, bookmark the site, and improve yourself every day 💪